Riset-disertasi - Revision history

Aditya at 05:56, 17 November 2025

2025-11-17T05:56:20Z

Aditya at 05:56, 17 November 2025

2025-11-17T05:56:00Z

Aditya: /* Server */

2025-11-04T03:03:33Z

Server

Aditya at 03:02, 4 November 2025

2025-11-04T03:02:41Z

Aditya at 02:18, 29 October 2025

2025-10-29T02:18:14Z

Aditya at 02:17, 29 October 2025

2025-10-29T02:17:32Z

Aditya at 02:15, 29 October 2025

2025-10-29T02:15:19Z

Aditya at 02:14, 29 October 2025

2025-10-29T02:14:54Z

Aditya at 02:09, 29 October 2025

2025-10-29T02:09:24Z

Aditya: Created page with "Riset-1 (ROI + Ascon via CoAP) → Paper Conference [port 5001 - 6001] =========================================== Tujuan: menunjukkan keunggulan selective encryption untu..."

2025-10-29T02:08:14Z

Created page with "Riset-1 (ROI + Ascon via CoAP) → Paper Conference [port 5001 - 6001] =========================================== Tujuan: menunjukkan keunggulan selective encryption untu..."

New page

[[Riset-1]] (ROI + Ascon via CoAP) → Paper Conference [port 5001 - 6001]
===========================================
Tujuan: menunjukkan keunggulan selective encryption untuk multimedia di IoT.
Evaluasi:
1. Kinerja sistem
* CPU usage / execution time enkripsi (per gambar, per resolusi).
* Latency end-to-end (ClientA → ServerB).
* Payload size (bytes dikirim).
* Retransmisi (via pcap).
2. QoE (Quality of Experience)
* SSIM/PSNR area non-ROI (harus ≈1 / ∞ → fidelity utuh).
* SSIM area ROI (rendah → privasi terlindungi).
3. Cryptographic footprint
* Distribusi bytes terenkripsi antar gambar/resolusi.
4. Privasi visual
* Apakah ROI (misalnya wajah) tak terbaca setelah enkripsi.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Riset-2]] (App-layer vs Transport-layer vs Hybrid) → Paper Q1 [port 5002 - 6002]
==================================================
Tujuan: membandingkan keamanan di layer aplikasi (ROI+Ascon) vs layer transport (OSCORE) vs kombinasi keduanya (cross layer).
1. Perbandingan overhead antar layer
* Latency (CoAP vs OSCORE vs ROI+Ascon+OSCORE).
* Payload size (besar header tambahan OSCORE).
* CPU usage: ROI+Ascon (app) vs OSCORE (transport).
2. Reliabilitas komunikasi
* Packet retransmission / packet loss.
* Goodput (gambar/MBps efektif).
3. Security
* Transport: full payload protected, tapi tidak selective.
* App-layer: selective encryption, lebih hemat.
* Kombinasi: double protection, overhead lebih tinggi.
4. Platform diversity
* Evaluasi di VM (GNS3) vs Raspberry Pi vs ESP32.
* Apakah constraint hardware mempengaruhi performa signifikan.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Riset-3]] (NanoCipher – AEAD baru) → Paper Q1 [port 5003 - 6003]
=======================================
Tujuan: membuktikan NanoCipher sebagai AEAD ringan khusus multimedia.
Evaluasi inti (kriptografi + sistem):
1. Benchmark kriptografi (MCU/CPU level)
* Cycles/byte (ukur dengan benchmark Ascon/PRESENT/ChaCha20).
* Throughput (MB/s).
* Code size (flash, KB).
* RAM usage.
* Energy/byte (estimasi via current measurement di Raspberry Pi/ESP32).
2. Keamanan algoritma
* Correctness: Known Answer Test (KAT).
* Nonce misuse resistance (uji basic).
* Konsistensi constant-time (cek dengan alat timing).
3. Perbandingan dengan cipher lain
* Ascon.
* PRESENT.
* ChaCha20.
* AES.
4. Integrasi
* Kirim gambar (via libcoap) dengan NanoCipher.
* Latency, payload, CPU, QoE → dibandingkan Ascon/AES/ChaCha20/PRESENT.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Riset-4]] (NanoCipher + OSCORE) → Paper Q1 [port 5004 - 6004]
====================================
Tujuan: menguji apakah NanoCipher bisa jadi alternatif AEAD di OSCORE (transport security).
Evaluasi:
1. Integrasi OSCORE
* Modifikasi libcoap → NanoCipher jadi AEAD opsional di COSE.
* Kinerja encode/decode OSCORE.
2. Perbandingan OSCORE-AES vs OSCORE-Ascon vs OSCORE-NanoCipher
* Latency per message.
* Payload overhead.
* CPU usage.
* Energy consumption.
3. Robustness
* Correctness (uji KAT + interop message decrypt).
* Replay protection (uji ulang id_context, sequence number).
4. Resource impact (IoT)
* Memory footprint tambahan bila OSCORE pakai NanoCipher.
* Apakah Raspberry/ESP32 masih muat (RAM/flash).

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 /home/noble/
 ├── experiments/
@@ Line 19: / Line 20: @@
               ├── chacha20/
               └── nanocipher/
+</pre>
 ==[[Riset-1]] (ROI + Ascon via CoAP) → Paper Conference [port 5001 - 6001]==

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:56, 17 November 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	/home/noble/
		+	├── experiments/
		+	│ ├── coap_5001_6001/ → Riset 1 (ROI + Ascon via CoAP)
		+	│ ├── coap_5002_6002/ → Riset 2 (App-layer vs OSCORE)
		+	│ ├── coap_5003_6003/ → Riset 3 (NanoCipher – AEAD Design)
		+	│ └── coap_5004_6004/ → Riset 4 (NanoCipher + OSCORE)
		+	│
		+	├── libcoap/ → CoAP library + OSCORE integration
		+	│
		+	└── shared/
		+	├── images/
		+	│ ├── 640x360/
		+	│ ├── 1280x720/
		+	│ └── 1920x1080/
		+	│
		+	└── algorithms/
		+	├── ascon/
		+	├── present/
		+	├── chacha20/
		+	└── nanocipher/
		+
		+
	==[[Riset-1]] (ROI + Ascon via CoAP) → Paper Conference [port 5001 - 6001]==		==[[Riset-1]] (ROI + Ascon via CoAP) → Paper Conference [port 5001 - 6001]==
	Tujuan: menunjukkan keunggulan selective encryption untuk multimedia di IoT.		Tujuan: menunjukkan keunggulan selective encryption untuk multimedia di IoT.

@@ Line 113: / Line 113: @@
 ├─ shared/
 │  └─ algorithms/                     # reusable libs di server juga
-│     ├─ ascon/                       # upstream ascon-c (steril)
+│     ├─ ascon/                       # upstream ascon-c (dari github resmi)
 │     ├─ ascon_r1_cli/                # wrapper CLI utk R1 (build server)
 │     ├─ nanocipher/                  # upstream NanoCipher
 │     └─ nanocipher_r3_cli/           # wrapper NanoCipher utk R3/R4
-├─ libcoap/                           # libcoap (build sekali per host)
+├─ libcoap/                           # libcoap (dari github resmi)
 └─ experiments/
     ├─ coap_5001_6001/

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:02, 4 November 2025
Line 77:		Line 77:
	#* Memory footprint tambahan bila OSCORE pakai NanoCipher.		#* Memory footprint tambahan bila OSCORE pakai NanoCipher.
	#* Apakah Raspberry/ESP32 masih muat (RAM/flash).		#* Apakah Raspberry/ESP32 masih muat (RAM/flash).
		+
		+
		+	Untuk kode dapat dilihat pada https://gitlab.com/aditbgoode/disertasi/
		+
		+	===Skema===
		+	====Client====
		+	<pre>
		+	/home/noble/
		+	├─ shared/
		+	│ ├─ images/ # dataset (akan digunakan untuk R1–R4 pakai)
		+	│ │ ├─ 640x360/ 1280x720/ 1920x1080/
		+	│ └─ algorithms/ # reusable libs & wrappers
		+	│ ├─ ascon/ # upstream ascon-c (dari github resmi)
		+	│ ├─ ascon_r1_cli/ # wrapper CLI utk R1 (ascon_aead_cli + Makefile)
		+	│ ├─ nanocipher/ # upstream NanoCipher
		+	│ └─ nanocipher_r3_cli/ # wrapper NanoCipher utk Riset-3/Riset-4
		+	├─ libcoap/ # libcoap (diambil dari github resmi)
		+	└─ experiments/
		+	├─ coap_5001_6001/ # R1 artefak
		+	│ ├─ client/
		+	│ │ ├─ bin/ # ascon_aead_cli (copy dari shared/*_cli/build)
		+	│ │ ├─ scripts/ # detect_poi.py, encrypt_roi_ascon.py, run_r1.sh
		+	│ │ └─ processed_r1/
		+	│ │ ├─ 640x360/ 1280x720/ 1920x1080/
		+	│ └─ libcoap_client/
		+	│ └─ coap-client
		+	├─ coap_5002_6002/ # R2 artefak
		+	├─ coap_5003_6003/ # R3 artefak
		+	└─ coap_5004_6004/ # R4 artefak
		+	</pre>
		+
		+	====Server====
		+	<pre>
		+	/home/noble/
		+	├─ shared/
		+	│ └─ algorithms/ # reusable libs di server juga
		+	│ ├─ ascon/ # upstream ascon-c (steril)
		+	│ ├─ ascon_r1_cli/ # wrapper CLI utk R1 (build server)
		+	│ ├─ nanocipher/ # upstream NanoCipher
		+	│ └─ nanocipher_r3_cli/ # wrapper NanoCipher utk R3/R4
		+	├─ libcoap/ # libcoap (build sekali per host)
		+	└─ experiments/
		+	├─ coap_5001_6001/
		+	│ └─ server/
		+	│ ├─ bin/ # coap-echo-server, ascon_aead_cli (copy dari shared/*_cli/build)
		+	│ ├─ inbox/
		+	│ ├─ tmp/
		+	│ ├─ decrypted/
		+	│ └─ logs/
		+	├─ coap_5002_6002/ # R2 artefak
		+	├─ coap_5003_6003/ # R3 artefak
		+	└─ coap_5004_6004/ # R4 artefak
		+	</pre>

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 #* Payload size (bytes dikirim).
 #* Retransmisi (via pcap).
 # QoE (Quality of Experience)
 #* SSIM/PSNR area non-ROI (harus ≈1 / ∞ → fidelity utuh).
 #* SSIM area ROI (rendah → privasi terlindungi).
 # Cryptographic footprint
 #* Distribusi bytes terenkripsi antar gambar/resolusi.
 # Privasi visual
 #* Apakah ROI (misalnya wajah) tak terbaca setelah enkripsi.
@@ Line 26: / Line 23: @@
 #* Payload size (besar header tambahan OSCORE).
 #* CPU usage: ROI+Ascon (app) vs OSCORE (transport).
 # Reliabilitas komunikasi
 #* Packet retransmission / packet loss.
 #* Goodput (gambar/MBps efektif).
 # Security
 #* Transport: full payload protected, tapi tidak selective.
 #* App-layer: selective encryption, lebih hemat.
 #* Kombinasi: double protection, overhead lebih tinggi.
 # Platform diversity
 #* Evaluasi di VM (GNS3) vs Raspberry Pi vs ESP32.
@@ Line 51: / Line 45: @@
 #* RAM usage.
 #* Energy/byte (estimasi via current measurement di Raspberry Pi/ESP32).
 # Keamanan algoritma
 #* Correctness: Known Answer Test (KAT).
 #* Nonce misuse resistance (uji basic).
 #* Konsistensi constant-time (cek dengan alat timing).
 # Perbandingan dengan cipher lain
 #* Ascon.
@@ Line 62: / Line 54: @@
 #* ChaCha20.
 #* AES.
 # Integrasi
 #* Kirim gambar (via libcoap) dengan NanoCipher.
@@ Line 75: / Line 66: @@
 #* Modifikasi libcoap → NanoCipher jadi AEAD opsional di COSE.
 #* Kinerja encode/decode OSCORE.
 # Perbandingan OSCORE-AES vs OSCORE-Ascon vs OSCORE-NanoCipher
 #* Latency per message.
@@ Line 81: / Line 71: @@
 #* CPU usage.
 #* Energy consumption.
 # Robustness
 #* Correctness (uji KAT + interop message decrypt).
 #* Replay protection (uji ulang id_context, sequence number).
 # Resource impact (IoT)
 #* Memory footprint tambahan bila OSCORE pakai NanoCipher.
 #* Apakah Raspberry/ESP32 masih muat (RAM/flash).

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 Evaluasi:
 # Kinerja sistem
-* CPU usage / execution time enkripsi (per gambar, per resolusi).
+#* CPU usage / execution time enkripsi (per gambar, per resolusi).
-* Latency end-to-end (ClientA → ServerB).
+#* Latency end-to-end (ClientA → ServerB).
-* Payload size (bytes dikirim).
+#* Payload size (bytes dikirim).
-* Retransmisi (via pcap).
+#* Retransmisi (via pcap).
 # QoE (Quality of Experience)
 * SSIM/PSNR area non-ROI (harus ≈1 / ∞ → fidelity utuh).

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-[[Riset-1]] (ROI + Ascon via CoAP) → Paper Conference [port 5001 - 6001]
+==[[Riset-1]] (ROI + Ascon via CoAP) → Paper Conference [port 5001 - 6001]==
 Tujuan: menunjukkan keunggulan selective encryption untuk multimedia di IoT.
 Evaluasi:
@@ Line 18: / Line 17: @@
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-[[Riset-2]] (App-layer vs Transport-layer vs Hybrid) → Paper Q1 [port 5002 - 6002]
+==[[Riset-2]] (App-layer vs Transport-layer vs Hybrid) → Paper Q1 [port 5002 - 6002]==
 Tujuan: membandingkan keamanan di layer aplikasi (ROI+Ascon) vs layer transport (OSCORE) vs kombinasi keduanya (cross layer).
 . Perbandingan overhead antar layer
@@ Line 38: / Line 36: @@
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-[[Riset-3]] (NanoCipher – AEAD baru) → Paper Q1 [port 5003 - 6003]
+==[[Riset-3]] (NanoCipher – AEAD baru) → Paper Q1 [port 5003 - 6003]==
 Tujuan: membuktikan NanoCipher sebagai AEAD ringan khusus multimedia.
 Evaluasi inti (kriptografi + sistem):
@@ Line 63: / Line 60: @@
 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-[[Riset-4]] (NanoCipher + OSCORE) → Paper Q1 [port 5004 - 6004]
+==[[Riset-4]] (NanoCipher + OSCORE) → Paper Q1 [port 5004 - 6004]==
 Tujuan: menguji apakah NanoCipher bisa jadi alternatif AEAD di OSCORE (transport security).
 Evaluasi: